Avora

Intraoral — Periapical, First Radiographic Image Template

The template

Pick your PMS to format the placeholders, then copy.

Periapical radiograph - first image.

RMH: Medical history reviewed/updates

Image order/necessity: Clinical signs/symptoms/risk factors supporting image
Patient consent/radiation discussion: Benefits/risks reviewed and consent
Image quality: Diagnostic quality or retake reason
Interpretation: Findings or no significant findings
Image labels/storage: Patient/date/tooth or area labels; linked to note/claim if needed

Indication: Indication/diagnosis
Tooth: #Tooth number(s)
Reason: Reason

Technique: Technique
Digital sensor.
Paralleling technique.
Image diagnostic quality.

Radiographic Findings: Radiographic findings
Crown: Crown
Root(s): Root(s)
PDL space: PDL space
Lamina dura: Lamina dura
Periapical area: Periapical area
Bone levels: Bone levels
Other: Other

Findings reviewed with patient.

NV: Next visit

Documentation requirements

D0220 is one of the most commonly under-documented codes. The image existing is not the documentation — the chart must capture why it was taken, what was seen, and that the dentist interpreted it. ADA/FDA selection-criteria guidelines and most carrier audit policies require this. A defensible D0220 chart note includes:

  • Indication / clinical justification — the specific signs, symptoms, or risk factors that prompted the image. "Routine" alone is not a defensible indication. Examples: "spontaneous throbbing #30," "deep distal caries #14, evaluate proximity to pulp," "trauma to #8, rule out root fracture," "post-op endo recall #19."
  • Tooth number or anatomic site — required by virtually every carrier when a single PA is billed. "Lower right" or "anterior" is not specific enough.
  • Patient consent / radiation discussion — confirm benefits and risks were reviewed. Pregnancy status confirmation when applicable; thyroid collar / lead apron use per office protocol.
  • Technique — paralleling vs bisecting angle, digital sensor vs PSP, kVp/mA if your office documents it. The auto-notes default reflects current best practice (digital sensor, paralleling).
  • Image quality / diagnostic acceptability — explicit "diagnostic quality" statement, or document the retake reason if the first exposure was nondiagnostic. Nondiagnostic images that were retaken are not separately billable.
  • Interpretation by the dentist — the heart of the note. Carriers (and state boards) treat an uninterpreted image as if the procedure was incomplete. Cover crown, root(s), PDL space, lamina dura, periapical area, bone levels, and any incidental findings. "No significant findings" is acceptable when truly the case — but it should appear as the dentist's conclusion, not a default.
  • Linkage to diagnosis or treatment plan — connect the radiographic finding to what changes because of it (e.g., "PARL #19 confirms diagnosis of necrotic pulp; RCT planned").
  • Image labeling / storage — date, patient identifier, and tooth/area on the image file; attached to the chart and available to the carrier on request.
  • Operator and interpreting dentist — who exposed the image and who read it (often the same person, but document both when different).

Avoid template defaults left in place ("WNL," "no significant findings") on every PA. If the PA was taken because something was suspected, the interpretation should reflect what was found or explicitly rule it out.

Common denial reasons

The most common reasons D0220 is denied, downgraded, or audited:

  • Bundled into D0210 (FMX rebundling) — the most common adjustment. Total intraoral images on the date of service hit the carrier's FMX threshold and the line items for D0220/D0230/D0274 are zeroed in favor of the D0210 fee.
  • Same-date conflict with D0210 — D0220 billed alongside an FMX on the same DOS without a distinct, narratively justified clinical reason
  • Missing tooth number or anatomic site — the single most preventable denial; most carriers require tooth-level specificity for any single PA
  • No documented indication / clinical necessity — chart note shows the image was taken but not why
  • No documented interpretation — image attached without the dentist's read of crown, roots, PDL, periapical area, bone levels
  • Frequency exceeded — patient's plan caps total PAs in a 12-month window and the cap was already met
  • D0210 frequency lookback triggers — carrier interprets the cumulative PA+BW activity as a comprehensive series and denies under D0210's 3- or 5-year limit
  • More than one D0220 on the same DOS — the second and subsequent PAs must be billed as D0230, not D0220. Most claim editors auto-deny duplicates of D0220.
  • Nondiagnostic / retake billed — only diagnostic-quality images are reimbursable; the retake of a nondiagnostic exposure is not separately billable
  • Missing operator/interpreting dentist signature — flagged by Medicaid auditors and some commercial carriers
  • Endodontic intraoperative imaging treated as inclusive — a small minority of payers consider working-length and master-cone PAs bundled into the endodontic fee

Stop writing periapical first notes by hand

Avora listens to the visit and produces a complete, defensible D0220 note in your template — automatically. Copy templates are useful. Avora is faster.

See Avora in action