Implant Crown Scan / Records Visit Template

Implant crown scan/impression.

RMH: Medical history reviewed/updates

Implant prosthesis support: Extraction/implant placement dates, implant system, abutment/component records
Support/retention type: Implant-supported vs abutment-supported; screw/cement retention
Maintenance findings: Peri-implant tissue, bone level/radiographs, occlusion, hygiene access
Torque/component details: Torque values, screw access, O-rings/gaskets/attachments if applicable

Implant site: #Tooth number(s)
Implant system: Implant system

Procedure:
Healing abutment removed.
Implant platform examined.
Scan body placed.
Intraoral scan taken.
Bite registration recorded.
Shade selected: Shade
Healing abutment replaced.

Crown type ordered: Crown type ordered
Screw retained.
Cement retained.
Abutment type: Abutment type

Complications: None or describe.
Patient tolerance: Tolerance/response.

NV: Next visit

Documentation requirements

The scan / records visit is documented for two audiences: the lab (so the case can be fabricated correctly) and the future auditor (so the bundling and ultimate billing are defensible). A defensible note includes:

• Medical history review and update — meds, conditions, allergies, anti-resorptive therapy (bisphosphonates, denosumab — affects peri-implant bone), uncontrolled diabetes, smoking status, and any conditions affecting peri-implant tissue. State what changed since last visit; "no changes" is acceptable but should be written, not omitted.
• Implant site and tooth number — Universal or FDI tooth number being restored. If multiple sites are being scanned at the same visit, document each.
• Implant placement history — extraction date (if known), implant placement date, placing surgeon (in-house or referring, with referral records on file), and implant system / brand / platform / diameter / length when available. The system drives scan-body selection, abutment-component compatibility, and ultimate torque specification. Carriers reviewing the eventual prosthetic claim will want the system named in the chart.
• Osseointegration confirmation — date of stage-2 uncovery (if two-stage), ISQ value or clinical confirmation of osseointegration (no mobility, no pain on percussion, no peri-implant radiolucency on the most recent PA), and that the implant is ready to restore. Most carriers expect a minimum healing interval of 3-4 months (mandible) or 4-6 months (maxilla) before the prosthesis is delivered.
• Peri-implant tissue assessment — soft-tissue color, contour, attachment, probing depths around the implant, bleeding on probing, and any signs of peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis. Photograph the emergence profile if relevant. If tissue is not healthy, the records visit is deferred — document why.
• Scan-body placement and verification — that the healing abutment was removed, the implant platform was examined and clean, the correct scan body for the implant system was seated and engaged, and that engagement was verified (visually, tactilely, and via the scan software's fit check).
• Intraoral scan — scanner brand and model (e.g., 3Shape TRIOS, iTero Element 5D, Medit i700), arches scanned (the implant arch and the opposing arch), and that the scan included the adjacent teeth at minimum two on each side for occlusal context. Note any rescan, retake, or stitching issue.
• Bite registration — method (digital scanned bite, PVS bite registration, or wax) and that the bite was verified bilaterally in MIP. For complex occlusal cases, document any deprogrammer or splint use.
• Shade selection — shade with brand of guide (e.g., "A2, Vita Classical"), digital shade match if used, and any custom characterization request to the lab. Photograph with shade tab adjacent for lab reference when esthetics are demanding.
• Healing abutment replaced — explicit: scan body removed, healing abutment retorqued to the manufacturer's healing-abutment specification (typically 10-15 Ncm), patient confirmed comfortable, screw access not needed (healing abutment is not a definitive restoration).
• Crown type ordered — material (monolithic zirconia, lithium disilicate, layered zirconia, PFM), brand if relevant, and the retention scheme (screw-retained vs cement-retained). The lab slip and chart should agree.
• Abutment type ordered — prefab stock (D6056), custom milled titanium (D6057), custom milled zirconia (D6057), one-piece zirconia, or TiBase integral to a screw-retained crown (typically not separately reported, drives a D6065 crown). The decision drives the eventual claim coding (D6056 + D6058 vs D6057 + D6058 vs D6065-only).
• Retention scheme — screw-retained or cement-retained, explicitly. For screw-retained cases, document the planned screw-access location and angulation; if the angulation is unfavorable, an angled screw channel (ASC) abutment may be needed and should be specified to the lab.
• Lab and lab instructions — lab name, written instructions sent (signed and dated, copy in chart), and estimated return date. The lab slip should specify the implant system, platform, the scan-body file, the abutment design and screw to be used, the crown material, and the retention scheme.
• Image support — recent PA showing stable peri-implant bone with no PARL or thread exposure (should be on file from uncovery or taken today if more than ~3 months old). Diagnostic-quality, labeled with site and date.
• Complications — explicitly noted, even if "none." Common: scan-body engagement issue requiring retake, peri-implant tissue inflammation deferring the visit, soft-tissue overgrowth requiring laser troughing before scan, bleeding obscuring the platform.
• Patient tolerance / response — how the patient tolerated healing-abutment removal, scan, and replacement. Most patients require no anesthesia for this visit; document if local was used and why.
• Next visit — typical: crown delivery in 2-3 weeks once lab returns the case. Document any planned try-in if the case is complex (multi-unit, esthetic anterior, custom abutment requiring fit verification).
• Billing intent — note explicitly in the chart how the case will eventually bill ("records visit, no fee today; abutment + crown to be billed at delivery as D6057 + D6058" or similar). This single line prevents downstream confusion and supports the bundling decision if audited.

The "amnesia test" applies: a third party reading the note must be able to reconstruct (1) which implant is being restored and what system it is, (2) what abutment and crown were ordered and at what retention scheme, (3) the shade and material, and (4) why this visit is or is not billable. Default-normal autotext that doesn't name the implant system, the abutment-reporting decision, or the lab order is the single biggest red flag if the eventual prosthesis is audited.

Common denial reasons

Because the scan / records visit is not separately billed in most workflows, denials specific to the visit are rare. The denials below apply to attempts to bill the records visit as a stand-alone service, and to the eventual abutment and crown when the records-visit documentation is weak.

• D9999 records visit denied as bundled — carriers treat the scan / impression / lab-order visit as inclusive of the abutment and crown under the "includes modification and placement" descriptor. Stand-alone records billing is denied as bundled. Document as patient-pay if the visit is being separately charged.
• D0470 (diagnostic casts) denied as bundled — most carriers bundle diagnostic casts into the prosthesis fee when the casts are part of the prosthetic workup. Stand-alone D0470 is reimbursable only when the casts are clearly diagnostic and pre-decisional (e.g., before a final prosthetic plan exists).
• D6056 / D6057 / D6058 / D6065 billed on the scan date — the abutment / crown procedure is not complete until delivery. Submitting on the scan date is a frequent cause of recoupment when the carrier's auditor matches the date of service against the chart's delivery date.
• No torque value in the chart at delivery — the records visit chart documents the lab order (abutment type, retention scheme, screw type), but the torque value belongs to the delivery visit. If the delivery chart is missing the torque value, the eventual abutment / crown can be downgraded or denied for documentation deficiency. The records-visit chart should plan the torque (per manufacturer); the delivery chart records it.
• Implant system not named — the records-visit chart that doesn't name the implant system, platform, or scan body makes it impossible for an auditor to verify component compatibility. Carriers reviewing the eventual prosthesis often request the system; if it's not in the chart, payment is delayed.
• Abutment-reporting decision not stated — the records-visit chart that doesn't say "screw-retained, no separate abutment to be reported" or "cement-retained, custom abutment ordered as D6057" leaves the bundling decision ambiguous. Eventual claim is reprocessed when the carrier sees an apparent mismatch between abutment line and crown line.
• Same-day attempt to bill abutment + crown on the scan date — the abutment placement and crown delivery happen at the delivery visit, not the scan visit. Billing both on the scan date will be denied (no procedure performed) or recouped on audit.
• Pre-authorization not obtained before scan — most carriers require pre-auth for the abutment and crown before the case is fabricated. If the records visit happens without pre-auth and the case is fabricated, the carrier's eventual response may be a partial payment or denial that the practice now owns. Always pre-auth before the records visit, not after.
• Records visit charged to the patient without disclosure — if the practice charges the patient a separate "records fee" without disclosing it as non-covered up front, this can be a state-board complaint. Document that the patient was informed the records visit is part of the global prosthetic fee, or that it is a separately disclosed fee, before the visit begins.

Related templates