Ask for receipts
Every diagnosis, treatment discussion, consent statement, and patient-specific risk factor should be easy to verify before signing.
Compliance guide
How to evaluate auditable AI dental notes for citations, provider review, HIPAA, PMS handoff, retention, and regulatory defensibility.
Book a Demo1,000+
dental professionals using Avora
Avora is used by dentists, hygienists, treatment coordinators, operations leaders, and dental groups across the United States.
BAA
available for Avora customers
Dental practices should not use an AI scribe with PHI unless the vendor will sign a business associate agreement.
AI dental notes are auditable when providers can verify important findings against the original appointment context, understand what data was used, review the note before saving, and maintain appropriate HIPAA, retention, and PMS workflows. Avora is designed around citable notes so dental teams can review clinical details before they become part of the chart.
Compliance comparisons often mix imaging AI, notetaking tools, PMS vendors, and general documentation products. Dental buyers need a clear checklist for what auditability means in AI-generated notes specifically.
| Requirement | Why it matters | What to verify | Avora approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source citations | Providers need to check clinical findings quickly | Can the note show the source moment for each important claim? | Avora emphasizes reviewable, citable note output |
| Provider approval | AI notes should not bypass clinical responsibility | Who signs, edits, and saves the final note? | Avora keeps provider review in the workflow |
| HIPAA contracts | Dental recordings and notes contain PHI | Will the vendor sign a BAA and document subprocessors? | Avora signs a BAA for customer deployments |
| Retention and deletion | Audio, transcripts, and notes need clear lifecycle rules | How long is each data type stored and who can access it? | Avora supports retention and deletion controls |
Auditability includes knowing where the note is saved and how it can be reviewed later inside the clinical record.
| PMS | Avora workflow | Common handoff areas |
|---|---|---|
| Dentrix | Native | Progress notes, perio, patient communications |
| Open Dental | Native | Progress notes, perio, patient communications |
| Eaglesoft | Native | Progress notes, perio, patient communications |
| Denticon | Native | Progress notes, perio, patient communications |
| Dentrix Ascend | Native | Progress notes, perio, patient communications |
| Other cloud PMS | Verify before rollout | Coverage varies by workflow |
PMS workflows vary by version, field, and rollout scope. Verify your exact configuration before signing.
A vendor can claim security controls and still create a risky clinical workflow if notes are opaque, hard to review, or disconnected from the chart.
Every diagnosis, treatment discussion, consent statement, and patient-specific risk factor should be easy to verify before signing.
Document where audio, transcripts, summaries, generated notes, and PMS copies are stored, retained, deleted, and accessed.
Run consent, contraindications, patient refusal, medical history changes, and disputed treatment discussions through the tool during review.
Frequently asked
We will walk through Avora's note review, citations, BAA, data flow, retention controls, and PMS handoff with your team.
Book a demo